Awesome

Consider it

*/1b3f701f762c5777fab5995115fd53dae71219d6c602550dcc

Friday, April 28, 2017

Should you roll your student loans into your mortgage? - CBS News


College graduates with student debt soon will have a new option: the ability to roll those student loans into their home mortgage. Fannie Mae, which works with virtually every lender in the country, has created a new standard that will allow borrowers with sufficient home equity to fold their student loan balances into their home mortgages.


But is that a smart thing to do?


The answer isn’t clear-cut. Turning student debt into mortgage debt could cut the interest rate and payments required of some debtors. However, it also strips away some of the protections that come with federally guaranteed student loans. Those who might need those protections may want to forego the program. But those who have significant home equity – and significant student debt – should take a close look.


Here’s what you need to know to decide whether the program is right for you:



How does it work?


Those with sufficient home equity and income will be able to execute so-called “cash-out” refinances, in which you get extra money to pay off other debts, said Jon Lawless, vice president of product development for Fannie Mae. In this case, the additional cash would be earmarked to repay student debt that you owe or have co-signed for.


There’s no specific dollar limit on how much student debt can be repaid this way. However, the Fannie Mae program restricts your total mortgage debt to that of a “conventional” loan. Conventional loan limits range between $424,100 and $636,150, depending on where you live. (High-cost areas, such as Alaska, Hawaii and major cities, such as Los Angeles and New York, qualify for the higher limits.)


In addition, the new loan cannot exceed 80 percent of the home’s value. And the borrower has to qualify for the higher loan amount based on normal underwriting standards, which typically expect that your mortgage payments won’t exceed one-third of your gross income.


What’s the difference between student debt and mortgage debt?


The biggest difference is that all types of federally insured student debt offer two compelling benefits: the ability to put payments on hold when you’re in school, out of work or disabled, and the ability to pay based on your income.


Mortgage loans — and some private student loans — provide neither of these breaks. Once you secure a mortgage, you cannot pay less than the amount you agreed to, unless you refinance the loan at a lower rate of interest or stretch out the repayment. If you fail to pay on a mortgage, the lender can foreclose, causing you to lose your home.


Of course, if you default on a student loan, the repercussions are also severe. But because of the ability to tap flexible repayment plans, the need to default even after a job loss is considerably lower.



Student loans aren’t all alike


They come in many types, and some may be smarter to refinance than others. For instance, you shouldthink twice before you roll so-called Perkins loans, subsidized Stafford loans and subsidized consolidation loans into a mortgage. That’s because the government will pay the interest on these loans if you put them into “deferment” to go back to school or because you lost your job. That can save you thousands of dollars.


Other types of student loans — direct, PLUS, unsubsidized Stafford loans and private loans — also may allow you to put payments on hold, but interest accrues during those “deferment” periods, which can dramatically boost the amount you owe. These loans are better suited to rolling into a mortgage.


Pay attention to interest differentials


If you have a low-rate student loan, refinancing it into a mortgage loan may not make sense.But if you have a higher-cost (or variable-rate) private or so-called PLUS loan, you may be able to save a bundle by refinancing. Fannie Mae’s Lawless said its research found that most student borrowers paid between 4 percent and 8 percent on their student debt, while the current average rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is around 4 percent today.


How much might refinancing save if you’re on the high end of that range? Consider, a hypothetical borrower we’ll call John, who financed law school with PLUS loans. John now has a $100,000 balance at an 8 percent interest rate. With an extended repayment plan amortized over 30 years, the monthly payment on this loan amounts to $734. If he can refinance that balance into a 30-year mortgage at 4 percent, his payment would drop to $477.


Refinancing saves John $257 per month and a whopping $92,520 in interest over the life of the loan.


What about taxes?


Interest paid on a home mortgage is generally tax-deductible. Some student loan interest may also be deductible, but those deductions are limited based both on the borrower’s income and by the amount that can be written off each year. Taxpayers who itemize deductions and earn substantial amounts — thus paying income taxes at higher federal rates — would benefit the most from rolling student loans into a mortgage.


Repayment options


With student loans, you can generally change your repayment plan by consolidating your loans. This can be helpful if you’re having trouble paying as much as you promised. In fact, the government offers a number of income-based repayment options that will allow you to pay based on what you can afford.


Mortgages don’t offer that option. If you think there’s a strong possibility that you’ll need to pay less — you’re planning to go to graduate school, for instance, or your job is unstable — you shouldn’t fold student loans into a mortgage because you lose that option.




Should you roll your student loans into your mortgage? - CBS News

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Mortgage Rates Slightly Higher After French Election

Mortgage rates moved moderately higher today, and most of the blame goes to the presidential election in France. If you’re wondering what European politics have to do with mortgage rates in the US, you’re not alone. While it certainly isn’t the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about what’s motivating rates, its impact was unmistakable today. To understand the connection, first consider that the EU economy is slightly bigger than that of the US. Then consider France is the third biggest economy in the EU. Germany is the biggest and the UK is the second biggest. On that note, don’t forget that the UK is currently in the process of exiting the European Union. Now to bring it all home, simply consider that one of the candidates in the French election (Marine Le Pen) wants France to


Mortgage Rates Slightly Higher After French Election

Monday, April 24, 2017

mortgage-with-no-credit-score-freddie-mac-offers-new-choices


mortgage with no credit score

Mortgage With No Credit Score: Possible Before, Easier Now


While the average credit score for successful mortgage borrowers in February 2017 was 720, (and 686 for FHA borrowers), not everyone who made the cut had great FICOs. In fact, some were able to get a mortgage with no credit score at all.


Zero.


High Credit Scores Improve Your Chances


When it comes to getting approved for a home loan, credit scores are one of the most important components.


Higher credit scores usually get you better interest rates and more loans to choose from.


Lower scores don’t necessarily kill your application, but they do make it harder to qualify. You may pay a higher rate, or have to make a larger down payment.


But what about prospective home buyers who have no credit scores?


No Credit Score = No Problem


Your credit is one of the most important qualifying factors used by mortgage lenders. This is because your credit history and your credit scores are pretty good predictors of how well you’ll pay your mortgage.


Without credit scores, it can be difficult for lenders to assess an applicant’s credit-worthiness, and ultimately whether they will repay their home loan as agreed.


Fortunately for people without credit scores, mortgage lenders can use a technique called non-traditional credit building. FHA and VA lenders, in particular, have underwritten this way for years. That’s one reason for their popularity with first-timers.


Non-traditional sources of credit history include:


  • Rent payments

  • Utility bills

  • Insurance

  • Cell phone

  • Personal loan with written terms and cancelled checks

Lenders verify your payment history with those accounts, just the way they would an auto loan or credit card payment using a regular credit report.


Manual Vs Automated Underwriting


It’s great to be able to get a home loan through non-traditional credit. However, this technique has a few drawbacks.


To use non-traditional credit, you have to apply for a manually-underwritten mortgage. Manual underwriting means the underwriter verifies the loan documentation by hand — not just relying on software.


These days, most home loans are analyzed with the help of a computer program commonly known as an Automated Underwriting System (AUS).


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each have their own AUS version. Fannie’s version is known as Desktop Underwriter (DU), while Freddie’s is Loan Prospector (LP).


Decisions, Decisions


Automated mortgage software might issue an “Approved” decision. That means all you have to do is provide the items listed on your approval — like your latest paystub — and you’re usually good to go.


The software may also issue a “Refer with Caution” recommendation. This usually means that the software has declined your application, assuming that the information submitted was correct.


There is a third type of finding. It’s called “Refer.” When the AUS generates a “Refer” recommendation, it’s saying that there is not enough information for the software to complete its process and make a decision.


In that case, a “manual underwrite” may be the only solution for getting the loan approved.


The Problem With Humans


Guidelines for many loans are stricter when they can’t go through automated underwriting.


For example, you may have to make a higher down payment or settle for a smaller loan amount.


The automated underwritten approval, for the most part, “is what it is”. In other words, most lenders accept the AUS approval and its list of required documentation.


Freddie Mac No Credit Score Option


Some of the disadvantages of manual underwriting systems might not apply to applicants after June 26, 2017. Some Freddie Mac homebuyers without FICO scores may be able to qualify for financing via automated underwriting.


This is huge for no-score homebuyers. You will no longer be “downgraded” with limitations that are associated with manually underwritten loans.


There are a few minor caveats associated with being approved for Freddie’s new no-score mortgage loan:


  • Transactions must either be home purchases or “no cash-out” refinances.

  • Properties must be occupied as primary residences.

  • Buyers must put at least five percent down.

  • Loans must have fixed interest rates.

If you can clear these small hurdles, though, your loan experience will be a lot less stressful.


What Are Today’s Mortgage Rates?


By automating the assessment of people without credit scores, mortgage giant Freddie Mac continues to extend homeownership opportunities to many U.S. families.


Lenders can now use determinations made by automated underwriting findings. This is great news for many Americans who may not have been able to purchase a home before now.


Click to see today’s rates (Apr 24th, 2017)



The information contained on The Mortgage Reports website is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for products offered by Full Beaker. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the policy or position of Full Beaker, its officers, parent, or affiliates.






mortgage-with-no-credit-score-freddie-mac-offers-new-choices

Sunday, April 23, 2017

Jane Bennett Clark--A Eulogy to Our "Beautiful Wordsmith"


On a very personal note, I’d like to share with you some tragic news that has deeply affected us here at Kiplinger. Senior editor Jane Bennett Clark, one of the most talented members of our staff, has passed away of head injuries she suffered recently after being struck by a bicyclist while walking to the Metro just a few blocks from our Washington, D.C., office. Kiplinger’s readers know Jane as our retirement expert. She wrote our March cover story (6 Steps to Retire When You Want), and in her final Rethinking Retirement column, she wrote about moving to be closer to adult children and grandkids.


See Also: Jane Clark’s Retirement IQ Quiz


Our staff knew Jane as a gifted author who could write about anything and make it sing. In fact, she did write about anything and everything during her career at Kiplinger—which began in 1977 and resumed full-time in 2002 after a hiatus to raise her three children. She once shopped with Marvin Hamlisch for a story on how to buy a piano. She did a feature story on bathroom remodeling, and in writing about sinks she led off with this sentence: “They’re so pretty you kind of hate to spit in them.” It was pure, witty Jane, painting an evocative picture.


No one could top her ability to conjure up just the right word to use in a headline. Last year she coauthored our series on women and money, which has so far won two journalism awards from her peers. She also supervised our annual college rankings project. Reacting to her death, one of her longtime college sources wrote to us, “I have greatly appreciated her compassion, sensitive nature, intelligence and rational, professional judgment. I know of no reporter who was more responsible or concerned with getting the story correct. And she always did. A thoroughly magnificent lady.”


After I described her recently as a “beautiful wordsmith,” I realized that Jane, ever the stickler for language, would have chided me that the phrase has a double meaning. Did I mean that she wrote beautiful prose, or that she was a beautiful person who wrote prose? In Jane’s case, both of those things are true.




Jane Bennett Clark--A Eulogy to Our "Beautiful Wordsmith"

What Mortgage Loan is Right for You? - Cape May County Herald


Wondering what type of mortgage loan is best for you? While a professional lender can walk you through your options in detail, we can give you a head start. Read on to get a basic understanding of the loans available to you.



Fixed-rate vs. Adjustable-rate


The first choice you’ll have to make is whether you want a fixed-rate loan or an adjustable-rate loan. A fixed-rate loan keeps the same interest rate for the entire repayment period, which can be 10, 15, 20 or 30 years. An adjustable-rate loan (ARM) has an interest rate that will change from time to time, but your initial interest rate will be lower. Adjustment intervals are predetermined and there are minimum and maximum rate caps to limit the size of the adjustment, so you won’t be hit with huge monthly fluctuations. There are different types of ARMs offered. One example is the 5/1 ARM, where your interest rate is set for five years then adjusts annually for 25 years.


Conventional vs. Government-insured


Aside from choosing between fixed-rate and adjustable-rate, you’ll also have to decide whether you want a government-insured loan such as FHA or VA (if you qualify), or a “regular” conventional loan.


FHA, VA and USDA loans are backed or guaranteed by the government. A Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan is designed for those who can’t come up with a large down payment or don’t have the best credit. This loan is a popular choice for first-time buyers, although it’s available to all types of buyers. Your down payment can be as low as 3.5 percent and your credit score must be 580 or higher. In some cases, a score as low as 500 may be accepted with 10 percent down. The catch: you have to pay for mortgage insurance, which increases the size of your monthly payments.


A Veterans Administration (VA) loan is available to qualifying veterans, active military and military families. This type of loan usually requires no down payment or mortgage insurance. If you qualify, this is almost always the best choice.


A USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) loan is intended to help those with steady, low or moderate income who intend to buy in rural areas but are unable to purchase a home through conventional financing. If you are eligible, no down payment is required and you can get a below-market mortgage rate. Income must be no higher than 115 percent of the adjusted area median income (AMI), which varies by county.


Conforming vs. Jumbo


The last thing to consider is the size of the loan. A conforming loan meets the guidelines of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, two government-controlled corporations that purchase and sell mortgage-backed securities. These guidelines are pre-established limits, including credit, income, asset requirements and loan amount.


If your loan exceeds these limits, it’s a jumbo loan. This loan poses a higher rick for the lender due to its size, therefore it requires excellent credit, a larger down payment and a higher interest rate. But a jumbo loan allows you to purchase a higher-priced home if you can afford it. Also, if the down payment is less than 20 percent, it might not require mortgage insurance.


Although this information will give you a basic understanding of your options, it is best to talk to a professional local lender to help determine what loan is right for you.




What Mortgage Loan is Right for You? - Cape May County Herald

Saturday, April 22, 2017

u-s-housing-stability-improves-for-third-consecutive-month


MCLEAN, VA–(Marketwired – Jan 28, 2015) – Freddie Mac (OTCQB: FMCC) today released its newly updated Multi-Indicator Market Index® (MiMi®) showing the U.S. housing market continuing to stabilize at the national level for the third consecutive month. Thirty-four of the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, and 37 of the 50 metros, are now showing an improving three month trend.


News Facts:


  • The national MiMi value stands at 74.7, indicating a weak housing market overall but showing a slight improvement (+0.35%) from October to November and a positive 3-month trend of (+1.07%). On a year-over-year basis, the U.S. housing market has improved (+3.94%). The nation’s all-time MiMi high of 122.5 was June 2006; its low was 60.3 in September 2011, when the housing market was at its weakest. Since that time, the housing market has made a 23.9 percent rebound.

  • Fifteen of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia have MiMi values in a stable range, with North Dakota (95.8) the District of Columbia (94.3), Montana (91.4), Wyoming (91.2), and Hawaii (89.1) ranking in the top five.

  • Eight of the 50 metro areas have MiMi values in a stable range, with San Antonio (89.5), Austin (87.0), Houston (85.3), Los Angeles (84.1) and Salt Lake City (83.6), ranking in the top five.

  • The most improving states month-over-month were Georgia (+1.32%), North Carolina (+1.28%), Michigan (+1.27%), Maryland (+1.14%) and Delaware (+1.12%) On a year-over-year basis, the most improving states were Nevada (+17.45%), Illinois (+10.15%), Rhode Island (9.65%) Colorado (+8.63%) and Ohio (+8.45%)

  • The most improving metro areas month-over-month were Atlanta (+1.64), Detroit (+1.40%), Charlotte (+1.35%), Birmingham (+1.32%) and Cleveland (1.20%). On a year-over-year basis the most improving metro areas were Las Vegas (+20.14%), Chicago (+12.37%), Denver (+10.68%), Miami, (+10.57%), and Providence (+9.45%).

  • In November, 34 of the 50 states and 37 of the 50 metros were showing an improving three month trend. The same time last year, 34 states plus the District of Columbia, and 41 of the top 50 metro areas were showing an improving three month trend.

Quote attributable to Freddie Mac Deputy Chief Economist Len Kiefer:


“Housing markets are stabilizing. Low mortgage rates help to keep affordability in-check across many markets. Labor markets are strengthening, but generally have room for improvement. We’re keeping an eye on markets with deep ties to energy. We’ve noticed some deterioration on a month-over-month basis in some of these energy markets, especially smaller markets with less diversified economies. Overall MiMi has improved for the third consecutive month showing housing markets are getting back on track.”


The 2015 MiMi release calendar is available online.


MiMi monitors and measures the stability of the nation’s housing market, as well as the housing markets of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the top 50 metro markets. MiMi combines proprietary Freddie Mac data with current local market data to assess where each single-family housing market is relative to its own long-term stable range by looking at home purchase applications, payment-to-income ratios (changes in home purchasing power based on house prices, mortgage rates and household income), proportion of on-time mortgage payments in each market, and the local employment picture. The four indicators are combined to create a composite MiMi value for each market. Monthly, MiMi uses this data to show, at a glance, where each market stands relative to its own stable range of housing activity. MiMi also indicates how each market is trending, whether it is moving closer to, or further away from, its stable range. A market can fall outside its stable range by being too weak to generate enough demand for a well-balanced housing market or by overheating to an unsustainable level of activity.


For more detail on MiMi see the FAQs. MiMi is released at 10 a.m. EST monthly. The most current version can be found at FreddieMac.com/mimi


Freddie Mac was established by Congress in 1970 to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the nation’s residential mortgage markets. Freddie Mac supports communities across the nation by providing mortgage capital to lenders. Today Freddie Mac is making home possible for one in four home borrowers and is one of the largest sources of financing for multifamily housing. Additional information is available at FreddieMac.com, Twitter @FreddieMac and Freddie Mac’s blog FreddieMac.com/blog.




u-s-housing-stability-improves-for-third-consecutive-month

growing-pains-election-in-a-small-maryland-city-exposes-racial-class-divides


A cluster of the historic homes line Perry Street in Mount Rainier, Md. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

Mount Rainier residents receive frequent postcards with unsolicited offers to buy their turn-of-the century Victorians and 1920s bungalows. All around Shepherd Street, contractors strip houses that will be flipped by investors eager to turn a profit in one of Prince George’s County’ oldest municipalities.


The pace of change has quickened in this former streetcar suburb, where artists and immigrants have flocked for the past three decades.


Anxiety over the influx of more affluent residents is fueling an unusually sour political season — tinged by a nasty debate over the decision to allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections such as the mayoral and council contests that will be decided May 1.


Longtime Mayor Malinda Miles faces a challenger in the upcoming election. It would be her fourth term if she wins. (Courtesy of Malinda Miles)

Mayor Malinda Miles — a Web-savvy, 70-year-old who bought her house in Mount Rainier decades ago, when she and other black residents were treated as second-class citizens — is campaigning for a fourth term on a platform of staving off gentrification and preserving the social safety net. Those themes are echoed by Charnette Robinson and Tyrese Robinson, two African American women running for council seats.


Miles faces a strong challenge from council member Jesse Christopherson, 39, a white California native who used to work on Capitol Hill. He and council candidate Celina Benitez, a Salvadoran immigrant running against Charnette Robinson, pledge to draw new energy and investment to Mount Rainier while preserving its funky, artistic vibe. Tyrese Robinson’s opponent is Luke Chesek, who is white and moved in two years ago.


City leaders say they expect more robust voter turnout than usual after a series of heated candidate forums, allegations of sign stealing and growing worry about whether Mount Rainier is changing beyond recognition.


“The majority of the new homeowners are white, and that’s a little concerning at times,” said Brooke Kidd, a 20-year resident who is white and runs Joe’s Movement Emporium, an arts center that draws from across Mount Rainier’s racial and class divides. “We need to make sure they are not making decisions from bias and privilege.”


Location, location, location


Mount Rainier’s proximity to downtown Washington — four often-traffic-choked miles — makes it an attractive option for those seeking roomier, more affordable real estate.


It’s a city that attracts artists such as dancer Emily Eakland, 34, and her partner, whose business, ReCreative Spaces, offers work and exhibit space for other local artists.


It’s also a quiet place where neighbors take care of one another, said Diana Edwards, a Miles supporter who moved here in 1986.


It was the perfect spot for Felix Romero to buy a house, open his flower-and-party-planning business in 2002 and — thanks to the January council vote allowing noncitizens to register — prepare to cast a U.S. ballot for the first time. He has a Christopherson sign in his store window.


Eakland, who is not publicly backing a candidate, says that she wants leaders who are committed to existing businesses but also court development that fits the city’s character.


“What I would hate to see,” she said, “is people pushed out, and artists being displaced.”


Christopherson said that he agrees, wholeheartedly. The stay-at-home father of two has lived in Mount Rainier since 2009 and served on the council since 2013. He makes a point of patronizing the mom-and-pop businesses along 34th Street, including a food co-op founded in 1969 by conscientious objectors to the Vietnam War.


“We need to recognize the gems, foster networks of entrepreneurs and bring in new business that is complementary to the customer base already here,” he said the other day while drinking a large organic coffee at the WaTerHole, one of the newer shops in town. “We have a great culture, and we should continue to preserve that Mount Rainier experience.”


City Council member Jesse Christopherson is running for mayor. (Courtesy of Jesse Christopherson)

Christopherson said that he respects Miles’s work to help poor and elderly residents avoid eviction, pay bills and feed and clothe themselves. But, in his opinion, the city has not made enough economic progress as housing prices have soared and has missed opportunities, especially downtown.


Miles said that market forces doomed a city-led revitalization project along Rhode Island Avenue. She argued that the city has seen gradual, sustainable improvements — including the creation of parks, green initiatives and the expansion of the police force.


Seniors like herself on fixed incomes, Miles said, could find themselves unable to pay their property taxes if home values rise too quickly — as they might if the mayor pushes development at a faster pace.


“If I move out of Mount Rainier, I can’t afford to move back here to live,” she said. “New isn’t always better. All change isn’t good.”



The historic business district of Mount Rainier features boutiques and restaurants. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

‘The elephant in the room’

In the early 1900s, Mount Rainier was a city of mostly white farmers known as a “sundown” town — where people of color, it was understood, should be gone by nightfall. Miles arrived in 1968, one of the first waves of black residents at a time when voter lists for municipal elections focused on homeownership and excluded many African Americans.


She said that she clearly remembers the resistance she encountered when she started to become involved in civic life in the 1970s.


Although Mount Rainier soon had an African American majority, the five-member council stayed all-white until the election of Otis Hayward in 1985. Miles won a council seat two years later.


Since then, large numbers of immigrants have settled in town, creating what longtime resident and sculptor Alan Binstock called a “diverse Mayberry.”


Nearly 40 percent of the approximately 8,500 residents are Latino, according to 2015 Census Bureau estimates. Meanwhile, the black population has fallen below 50 percent. Miles is the only African American on the council.


The racial dynamics of the election are “more than just the elephant in the room,” said Nicole Goines, Christopherson’s campaign manager. “It’s the entire room.”



Barber William Moore cuts the hair of DJ Alexander, 4, at Hands On Barber Shop in Mount Rainier. Moore has owned the shop for 18 years and wonders how long he can keep it running as property taxes rise. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

Benitez, a transplant from Los Angeles, decided to run after becoming involved in efforts to reach out to other Latino residents, who she said have been neglected by city government over the years.


“A minority within a minority” is how she described the immigrants who live mostly in World War II-era apartment buildings on the fringes of town but in some cases have bought homes closer in.


“The City Council should represent the whole community,” she said.


Benitez joined Christopherson, who speaks Spanish, and others to push for the law that allows noncitizens to vote in city elections. They are now campaigning to declare Mount Rainier a “sanctuary city.”


Such advocacy, she said, made her a target of “racial antagonism” from her campaign opponent, Charnette Robinson, a D.C. police commander and longtime Mount Rainier resident.


Charnette Robinson sent a letter to the council questioning the legality of noncitizen voting, which she called a “ploy to ensure votes for particular candidates.” The letter described the sanctuary debate as “an attempt to protect the rights of illegal aliens in ways rarely done for poor and minority citizens.”


The last page demanded proof that Benitez lives within city limits and was therefore eligible to run for council, even though the election board had already certified her residency.



Produce manager Latteta Theresa arranges fruit at The Glut in Mount Rainier. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

A diversity divide

Charnette Robinson vigorously denied that her inquiry had anything to do with her rival’s ethnicity and said she has a right to ask whether a candidate lives in the city or to question the need for a sanctuary label.


“We don’t need an ordinance to stipulate what we already know to [be] true — Mount Rainier is a community that welcomes diversity,” she wrote in an online forum. “As representatives, we must be inclusive, and not create ordinances that are one-direction and divisive.”


Miles abstained from the January vote that allowed noncitizen voting, which passed 3 to 0. Christopherson voted yes. Election officials said that 21 new voters have registered as a result of the legislation.


Initially, Miles said, it felt almost irreverent and too easy to extend voting rights to noncitizens after African Americans from her parents’ generation had to fight so hard to obtain those rights themselves.


But then someone asked her a question: “They said, ‘Do you want everyone to go through what you did to get this right?’ ” the mayor recalled. “So I asked myself, ‘Do I want that for someone else?’ ”


Still, she chose not to cast a vote on the issue, concerned about amending the city charter.


She said that her support for immigrants has not wavered. She signed an executive order to prohibit city police from helping to enforce federal immigration law after legislation to enact that policy failed to pass the council.



Children play with hula hoops during spring break camp aftercare at Joe’s Movement Emporium. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

Municipal elections in Mount Rainier rarely draw more than 500 voters to the polls. But political observers in the city said that if the packed candidate forums are any indication, this year’s contest could change that.


“The fact that we have hotly contested elections means people are paying attention,” said Del. Jimmy Tarlau (D-Prince George’s), a Mount Rainier resident. “We hope that no matter who wins, the city will move forward and keep the diverse, eclectic nature of the community intact.”



growing-pains-election-in-a-small-maryland-city-exposes-racial-class-divides

Friday, April 21, 2017

political-holding-pattern-affirms-conservative-growth-forecast


April 17, 2017


Political Holding Pattern Affirms Conservative Growth Forecast




Matthew Classick




202-752-3662



WASHINGTON, DC – The 2017 growth forecast remains at a modest 2.0 percent as policy changes that could result in meaningful economic growth appear unlikely this year, according to the Fannie Mae Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group’s April 2017 Economic and Housing Outlook. Additionally, near-term risk of a potential government shutdown could weigh on consumer and business confidence. While nearly all measures of confidence remain strong, some hard economic data—including consumer spending and auto sales—are now trending lower. Weak economic news and increased geopolitical risks have moved long-term interest rates lower. Housing activity through February fared better than other hard economic indicators partly due to the warm winter weather, and the ESR group expects that a seasonal uptick in listings going into the spring selling season will help alleviate extremely tight inventory. In addition, recent declines in mortgage rates may motivate some homebuyers to enter the market before rates pick up as the Federal Reserve continues to normalize monetary policy.


“Our economic forecast remains unchanged in April as we continue to await details on the new Administration’s plans,” said Fannie Mae Chief Economist Doug Duncan. “We’re intrigued by the disparity between elevated consumer and business optimism and signs of decelerating first quarter economic growth. However, we expect growth to rebound this quarter as special factors that weighed on growth partially unwind. With the firming of the Fed’s favored measure of inflation, reduced labor market slack, and the more hawkish tone of the Federal Open Market Committee at its March meeting, we foresee that the Fed will hike rates two more times this year, in June and September, and announce a change to its reinvestment policy in December.”


Visit the Economic & Strategic Research site at www.fanniemae.com to read the full April 2017 Economic Outlook, including the Economic Developments Commentary, Economic Forecast, Housing Forecast, and Multifamily Market Commentary. To receive e-mail updates with other housing market research from Fannie Mae’s Economic & Strategic Research Group, please click here.


Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae’s Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae’s business prospects or expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR Group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current, or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR Group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.

Fannie Mae helps make the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage and affordable rental housing possible for millions of Americans. We partner with lenders to create housing opportunities for families across the country. We are driving positive changes in housing finance to make the home buying process easier, while reducing costs and risk. To learn more, visit fanniemae.com and follow us on twitter.com/FannieMae.


political-holding-pattern-affirms-conservative-growth-forecast

bls-march-unemployment-rates-in-arkansas-colorado-maine-and-oregon-at-new-series-lows


From the BLS: Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary


Unemployment rates were lower in March in 17 states and stable in 33 states and the District of Columbia, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Eighteen states had jobless rate decreases from a year earlier, and 32 states and the District had little or no change. The national unemployment rate declined by 0.2 percentage point from February to 4.5 percent and was 0.5 point lower than in March 2016.



Colorado had the lowest unemployment rate in March, 2.6 percent, closely followed by Hawaii, 2.7 percent, and New Hampshire, North Dakota, and South Dakota, 2.8 percent each. The rates in Arkansas (3.6 percent), Colorado (2.6 percent), Maine (3.0 percent), and Oregon (3.8 percent) set new series lows. (All state series begin in 1976.) New Mexico had the highest jobless rate, 6.7 percent.

emphasis added


State UnemploymentClick on graph for larger image.


This graph shows the current unemployment rate for each state (red), and the max during the recession (blue). All states are well below the maximum unemployment rate for the recession.


The size of the blue bar indicates the amount of improvement. The yellow squares are the lowest unemployment rate per state since 1976.


The states are ranked by the highest current unemployment rate. New Mexico, at 6.7%, had the highest state unemployment rate.


State UnemploymentThe second graph shows the number of states (and D.C.) with unemployment rates at or above certain levels since January 2006. At the worst of the employment recession, there were 11 states with an unemployment rate at or above 11% (red).


Currently no state has an unemployment rate at or above 7% (light blue); Only two states are at or above 6% (dark blue). The states are New Mexico (6.7%), and Alaska (6.4%).


Note: The series low for Alaska is 6.3% (almost a new low in Alaska too).







bls-march-unemployment-rates-in-arkansas-colorado-maine-and-oregon-at-new-series-lows

mortgage-rates-dip-to-2017-low-but-homebuyers-sit-on-the-sidelines

People looking at houses in San Francisco | David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images


David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images


Mortgage rates have dipped to their lowest level of 2017, just in time for homebuying season. Uh, we’re going to have a homebuying season this year, right?


With the 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage averaging 4.16 percent this week, home loans haven’t been this low since December. You would think this would be the perfect opportunity for would-be homeowners to shop for mortgages and then to get out there and look at houses. But that’s not happening, at least on the mortgage side of the equation.


There aren’t enough homes to buy


Homebuyers applied for fewer mortgages last week than they did the same week a year before, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. The year-over-year decline was just 1 percent, but still, a soft beginning to homebuying season isn’t what forecasters expected. After all, more people have jobs. Maybe fewer people applied for mortgages last week because of Good Friday, or maybe the year-over-year decrease is due to the fact that mortgage rates were a lot lower a year ago.


But the most likely explanation is that not enough houses are for sale. When people can’t find homes to buy, they don’t apply for mortgages. The inventory of homes for sale, especially for starter homes, is at its lowest level in more than 10 years, according to Freddie Mac’s latest economic outlook, “Where Have All the Houses Gone?


The note points out that in February, the typical home was sold after being on the market for three months. That’s an abnormally short time on market. From 1985 to 2015, homes typically were on the market for 5.3 months before they were sold — almost twice as long as in February. Those stats come from the National Association of Realtors, which issues its next Existing Home Sales report on Friday — and it will show that there’s still a shortage of homes for sale. The only question is whether the shortage got worse or if it eased up a bit.


We need more new homes


Homebuilders aren’t going to rescue desperate would-be homeowners. Housing starts in March were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.22 million units, according to the Census Bureau. That’s well below the 1.7 million new homes we need to replace torn-down homes, accommodate new households and provide second homes for those who can afford them. In other words: We need builders to construct half a million more homes per year than they’re building. Too bad they’re not doing it now, so buyers could take advantage of today’s low mortgagerates.


Mortgage rates this week



The benchmark 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell this week to 4.16 percent from 4.22 percent, according to Bankrate’s weekly survey of large lenders. A year ago, it was 3.75 percent. Four weeks ago, the rate was 4.29 percent.


The 30-year fixed mortgages in this week’s survey had an average total of 0.28 discount and origination points.


Over the past 52 weeks, the 30-year fixed has averaged 3.92 percent. This week’s rate is 0.24 percentage points higher than the 52-week average.


  • The 15-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 3.35 percent from 3.43 percent.

  • The 5/1 adjustable-rate mortgage fell to 3.42 percent from 3.46 percent.

  • The 30-year fixed-rate jumbo mortgage fell to 4.07 percent from 4.15 percent.

At the current 30-year fixed rate, you’ll pay $486.69 for every $100,000 you borrow, down from $490.19 last week.


At the current 15-year fixed rate, you’ll pay $707.54 for every $100,000 you borrow, down from $711.45 last week.


At the current 5/1 ARM rate, you’ll pay $444.59 for every $100,000 you borrow, down from $446.81 last week.



Weekly national mortgage survey


Results of Bankrate.com’s weekly national survey of large lenders conducted April 19, 2017 and the effect on monthly payments for a $165,000 loan:






















30-year fixed15-year fixed5-year ARM
This week’s rate:4.16%3.35%3.42%
Change from last week:-0.06-0.08-0.04
Monthly payment:$803.03$1,167.44$733.58
Change from last week:-$5.78-$6.45-$3.66



mortgage-rates-dip-to-2017-low-but-homebuyers-sit-on-the-sidelines

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Dear Baby Boomer: Retirement Is This Close, and You Need to Deal With a Few Issues


I know you’re ready. You’re so close to retirement, you can taste the cool beverages on the beach and feel the sand between your toes.


SEE ALSO: Don’t Let Hidden Investment Fees Hijack Your Retirement


Unfortunately, at the rate you’re going, dear Baby Boomer, your retirement might not be exactly as you dreamed it.


Maybe it’s because you never could quite imagine getting this old, or because they keep changing the rules (or threatening to) as you go along, but your retirement is going to be a bumpy ride if you don’t exercise a little tough love.


Here are four issues you’ll need to tighten up on in order to enjoy that sunny future.



Advertisement



1. Boomerang kids.


According to a study by Federal Reserve Board economists, the number of young adults (ages 18 to 31) who lived with their parents rose 15% between 2005 and 2014 — to a historic high of 36%. And those parents who aren’t housing their adult children are often helping them financially — paying student loans, co-signing car loans and more.


I’ve talked to people who have taken out money from a 401(k) to help their kids — who are in their 30s and 40s — buy a home. That’s a huge blunder, for a couple of reasons.


Besides creating a potential dependency problem that could dog your kids for life, all that help is drawing from resources you’ll need when you retire. Parents who are 65 years or older with financially independent kids are more than twice as likely to be retired as those who financially support their adult children, according to a 2015 study by retirement market research firm Hearts & Wallets. If you can’t bring yourself to kick them out, at least insist that your kids contribute something toward room and board. And stop paying for their cellphones and car insurance!


2. Longevity.


You’re likely to live longer than you think, which, of course, is a blessing — but one you’ll have to plan for. A man who is 55 years old now can expect to live to 83 or 84; a woman the same age will likely live to 87. When the Social Security program was initiated in 1935, the average life expectancy was 61.



Advertisement



Still, a lot of people just can’t imagine decades of retirement — or what it will mean when it comes to their income plans. It used to be that the standard withdrawal strategy was to take 4% from the initial value of your savings — and if you did that annually with a balanced portfolio (which used to mean 50% in stocks and 50% in bonds), you’d be able to avoid running out of money.


That’s no longer the case — not in our low-yield world. Mutual-fund managers T. Rowe Price and the Vanguard Group as well as online brokerage Charles Schwab have issued reappraisals of the guideline, to now lower than 4%. And many advisers are reassessing withdrawal percentages annually based on market fluctuations. So — yay! — you’ll probably live to see more grandkids and grand sights than you ever thought, but it will require a much bigger nest egg than the one you’ve been building.


3. Health care costs.


Just because you’re going to live longer doesn’t mean you’ll stay healthy all that time. The average 65-year-old couple retiring in 2016 will need $260,000 to cover their medical expenses throughout retirement, a recent Fidelity report concluded. That’s not all the bad news. What makes it worse is that, according to a 2016 PWC survey, roughly half of all Baby boomers Boomers have a nest egg of $100,000 or less to pay for everything.


If you’re counting on Medicare to cover your costs, don’t. You’ll need a supplement or advantage plan to help with some of your expenses, and if you need to recover from an illness or an injury, your Medicare coverage will stop as soon as you are better, which is not the problem. What can be a significant issue is if the benefit allotment runs out. The Genworth 2016 Cost of Care Study found that the national median cost of long-term care rose across all settings, except adult day care — and the sharpest increase was for services provided in the home.



Advertisement



How would you cover such expenses? Options include long-term care insurance, annuities or a cash-value life insurance policy with a long-term care rider. (Pointing to how healthy your Great-Aunt Edna was at 92 doesn’t count as a plan.)


4. Income streams.


Financial professionals used to talk about the three-legged stool of retirement income: Social Security, employee pensions and personal savings. But that’s a pretty wobbly stool these days.


You’ll need a plan that’s built to handle the possibilities that inflation and taxes will rise. Protect yourself by moving your retirement savings out of any investments that carry a lot of risk. And don’t count on Social Security as your main source of income — it’s projected that the trust won’t be able to fully fund benefits starting in 2034.


To give you a little perspective: The youngest Baby Boomers, born in 1964, will be 70 that year.



Advertisement



The road to retirement is littered with obstacles — some of which you can control. Put your daydreams on pause and pick up the phone: If you haven’t already, find a trusted adviser to help you clear the way.


See Also: A Word of Caution to Retirees Eyeing the Market With Renewed Enthusiasm


Investment advisory services offered through Kingdom Financial Group, LLC, an SEC Registered Investment Adviser. We are an independent firm helping individuals make retirement income planning more successful by using a variety of strategies to custom suit their needs and objectives. By contacting us, you may be provided information about insurance products and investment opportunities. Annuity product guarantees are subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuing company and are not offered by Kingdom Financial Group, LLC.


Steve Fullerton is co-founder of Fullerton Financial Planning and is FINRA licensed with Series 7, 63 and 66, as well as health and life. He is the founder and president of Kingdom Financial Group LLC, a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC.


Comments are suppressed in compliance with industry guidelines. Our authors value your feedback. To share your thoughts on this column directly with the author, click here.


This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.






Dear Baby Boomer: Retirement Is This Close, and You Need to Deal With a Few Issues

RBC Seeks to Join Canada Mortgage-Bond Fray on Nonprime Deal ... - Bloomberg


Royal Bank of Canada is the latest Canadian firm to explore a sale of bonds backed by uninsured residential mortgages.

The bank is testing investor interest in a deal that would bundle mortgage loans to borrowers with credit ratings just below prime, known as “alt-A” mortgages, according to Tim Wilson, chief financial officer of Equitable Group Inc., one of the lenders which is originating the loans being bundled.

“Along with the banks, we’re trying to understand what the investor appetite could be in terms of both volume and price,” Wilson said by phone from Toronto. “Once we get a sense of that, we can make decisions about size, and even if the opportunity makes sense at all.”






Canadian banks are eager to package uninsured home loans into bonds after the federal government last year made it harder for lenders to get government guarantees on mortgages. Bank of Montreal is planning a residential MBS to securitize C$2 billion ($1.5 billion) of prime uninsured mortgages. National Bank of Canada is exploring investor interest in a deal that would be backed by MCAP Corp. “alt-A” mortgages.

Hot Housing Market


The RBC deal would be sponsored by Steel Curtain Capital Group LLC and Ashley Park Financial Services. It may also include mortgage loans from Home Capital Group Inc., according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the deal is private.


Spokesmen for Toronto-based Royal Bank of Canada and Home Capital declined to comment. Representatives for Paradigm Quest Inc., a mortgage servicing company that is affiliated with Ashley Park, weren’t immediately able to comment.

Steel Curtain Capital is exploring opportunities for creating a multi-lender residential mortgage securitization platform in Canada and is speaking to multiple lenders and third-party service providers, owner Frank Pallotta said by phone. He declined to comment on the deal being marketed by RBC.

The prospective offering comes as Ontario announced measures Thursday aimed at cooling Toronto’s hot housing market, including a 15 percent tax that will apply to foreign buyers of residential properties containing one to six units in the greater Toronto area. Home prices in the city jumped a record 33 percent in March from the same month last year. Affordability in the city reached its worst level since 1990 at the end of 2016, according to a report from Royal Bank of Canada.



Subprime borrowers are generally considered to be home-buyers with FICO scores below 620 and mortgages with a loan-to-value ratio above 80 percent. The credit scoring scale from Fair Isaac Corp. ranges from 300 to 850.




RBC Seeks to Join Canada Mortgage-Bond Fray on Nonprime Deal ... - Bloomberg

Saturday, April 15, 2017

How a Border Tax Would Affect You


After grappling with your own tax return, you probably haven’t given a lot of thought to how much Apple and ExxonMobil pay Uncle Sam. But a Republican plan to reengineer the corporate tax code could have a direct impact on your bottom line. How much? That depends on whom you talk to and where they stand on the border adjustment tax.


See Also: Kiplinger’s Economic Outlooks — Trade Deficit


The border adjustment tax would eliminate taxes on income from products sold outside the U.S. while removing tax deductions for the cost of imported goods, which would effectively impose a 20% surcharge on imports. Proponents say the change would encourage companies to make products in the U.S., thus generating more jobs. The tax on imports would raise an estimated $1 trillion over 10 years, enabling the government to cut corporate tax rates—currently, the highest in the world—from 35% to 20%. Chief executives of companies that are big exporters, such as Boeing, Caterpillar and Pfizer, are big fans of the BAT. They say the current business tax code gives an unfair advantage to foreign competitors and foreign-made goods.


But chief executives from Wal-Mart, Target, Macy’s and dozens of other retailers contend that the BAT would increase the cost of just about everything by up to 20%. For most consumers, switching to items made in the U.S. isn’t an option. About 97% of the clothes and 98% of the shoes sold in the U.S. are made overseas, according to the American Apparel and Footwear Association. “Whether it’s the automobile you drive, the gasoline you use, the groceries you put on the table, or the shoes and the clothes you put on your feet and back, the prices of all of those things will get driven up by the border adjustment tax,” says National Retail Federation chief executive Matthew Shay. The BAT has strong support from House Republican leaders but faces headwinds in the Senate, where some Republican lawmakers have expressed concern about how it will affect big retailers.


The plan’s supporters argue that a sharp increase in the value of the dollar would help offset any price hikes. Here’s how: The tax break for U.S. exporters would allow those companies to lower prices initially, which would increase demand for their products overseas. That, in turn, would boost demand for dollars, driving up the value of the greenback by 20% or more. A stronger dollar would increase purchasing power for U.S. companies and consumers who buy materials or products from overseas, thus offsetting the higher tax on imports.



Advertisement



Because a BAT has never been tried, it’s unknown how long it would take to reach that kind of equilibrium. Currency traders might buy dollars in anticipation of a policy change, hastening the greenback’s rise. But economists at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonpartisan research group, say the adjustment overall could take years, and in the meantime, at least some portion of the tax would be passed on to consumers.


If you’re planning a trip to Paris, a stronger dollar is great news, but it has its pitfalls, too, particularly where your portfolio is concerned. As the dollar rises, it depresses returns from investments denominated in foreign currencies. One way around that problem is to look for funds that hedge their currency exposure, such as FMI International (symbol FMIJX), a member of the Kiplinger 25, the list of our favorite funds.


See Also: 4 Best Mutual Funds for Foreign Stocks




How a Border Tax Would Affect You

The huge cost new parents may be overlooking


(iStock)

Some expecting parents may forget to prepare for what will likely be their biggest expense when the baby arrives: child care.


When asked how much they think it costs to raise a baby, 54 percent of people planning to have children in the next three years said they expect to spend less than $5,000 a year, according to a recent survey by the personal finance site NerdWallet.


That would be barely enough to cover the cost of day care in most states.


On average, child-care costs for one infant can rangefrom more than $5,000 a year to more than $20,000, depending on the state, according to Child Care Aware of America, a nonprofit group that advocates for affordable child care. For example,full-time day care for an infant costs an average of $22,658 annually in the District. In South Carolina, it costs $6,483 on average.


Some parents-to-be may be focusing too much on other costs for their new child. The majority of expecting parents said clothes, a car seat and a crib would be their biggest spending priorities in the first year of raising a child, according to the NerdWallet survey. Only 30 percent listed child care as a spending priority.


“They put too much attention on items that don’t really add up that much,” says Amy Danise, an insurance expert at NerdWallet.


For many young parents, the bill for child care can be overwhelming. In 17 states and the District, millennial parents earning the median income would need to spend at least half of their pay to send an infant to a day-care center, according to a March report from Child Care Aware of America.


There were only seven states, including Wyoming, Louisiana and Mississippi, where it would take up less than 30 percent of the median paycheck for millennials.


“It’s the biggest expense, maybe bigger than housing for some people,” says Elise Gould, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank.


While there are state and federal programs available to help parents pay for child care, there are strict income requirements and often long wait lists, Gould says.


For some parents, the sticker shock can lead to tough choices about whether both parents should continue to work, says Michelle McCready, chief of policy at Child Care Aware of America.


Others are able to make ends meet by relying on family, sharing a nanny with other parents or applying for assistance.


Five years ago, Ssire Ivy was working at a call center earning $9 an hour in Pennsylvania when she was told she made too much to qualify for child-care assistance for her son, Aydin. “It was devastating because I didn’t know where I was going to come up with the money,” says Ivy, 27, adding that the $200 weekly bill for day care would have taken up more than half of her paycheck.


Ivy eventually moved to St. Louis to be closer to family, who could help her care for her son. After her daughter Malia was born three years ago, she decided to go back to school and was able to qualify for child-care assistance while she worked part time and studied. Now that she is about to graduate with her associate degree and return to working full time, Ivy expects that she will no longer qualify for the financial help.


But she hopes to be able to land a better-paying job that can make it easier for her to afford the costs, which she estimates will start at about $350 a week but drop to about $150 a week after her son starts kindergarten in the fall.


Read more:


Why parenting is even more daunting for millennials than it was for their parents — or their grandparents


Why some families who save constantly are still struggling to make ends meet


5 small ways to boost your finances if you’re living paycheck to paycheck



The huge cost new parents may be overlooking

Independent mortgage banks post record revenue per loan in 2016 ... - HousingWire


Independent mortgage banks and mortgage subsidiaries of chartered banks posted record high revenue in 2016, but before they could enjoy the profit, mortgage expenses also reached a record high.


As a result, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Annual Mortgage Bankers Performance Report, independent mortgage banks only made slightly more money in 2016 than in 2015. The average profit came in a $1,346 on each loan originated in 2016, up from $1,189 per loan in 2015.





Marina Walsh, MBA’s vice president of industry analysis, noted the rise reflected a larger industry trend of increasing volume in 2016 over 2015, based on MBA industry estimates.


“Average loan balances also rose, reaching a study-high $244,945 for first mortgages in 2016,” Walsh said. “This translated into higher revenues that reached a study-high $8,555 per loan in 2016. Yet production expenses also reached a study-high, at $7,209 per loan, and offset a portion of these revenue improvements. The net result was a slight increase in overall net production income.”


This year marks the 7th consecutive year of rising loan balances on first mortgages.


The report stated that average production volume was $2,679 million (11,161 loans) per company in 2016, compared to $2,405 million (9,906 loans) per company in 2015.


On the servicing side, Walsh said, “Mortgage lenders with servicing portfolios experienced significant fluctuations in the valuation of their mortgage servicing rights related to corresponding interest rate fluctuations during 2016.”


“Most servicers reported net servicing financial losses in the first half of the year, followed by recoveries by the end of the year,” she added.


Net servicing financial income, which includes net servicing operational income as well as mortgage servicing right amortization and gains and losses on MSR valuations, dropped to $34 per loan in 2016, down from $73 per loan in 2015.


Looking back at only the fourth quarter, Walsh said, at the time, that mortgage lenders with servicing portfolios benefited from higher net servicing financial income in the fourth quarter 2016 due to increases in the valuation of their mortgage servicing rights, driven by the same rising interest rates.




Independent mortgage banks post record revenue per loan in 2016 ... - HousingWire

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Early movers: UAL, WFM, LULU, MYL, WMT, PEP & more


Check out which companies are making headlines before the bell:


United Continental — Shares of the airline, which is caught up in a public relations nightmare, are trading slightly higher Wednesday morning, recovering losses of as much as 4 percent on Tuesday. Chief Executive Oscar Munoz appeared on ABC’s “Good Morning America” Wednesday morning, issuing a more formal apology and promising “this will never happen again.”


Whole Foods Market — Shares of Whole Foods dropped on Tuesday after jumping nearly 10 percent on Monday when activist investor Jana Partners took a near 9 percent stake in the company, making Jana the second-largest shareholder in the grocery chain. The activist investor is reportedly pressuring Whole Foods to consider a sale, as the chain has struggles while other grocers make inroads into its natural and organics foods business.



Lululemon — The athletic apparel brand was upgraded to “buy” from “hold” at Stifel, with the firm explaining why investing in Lululemon presents an opportunity for long-term investors. After a “merchandising misstep” in the first quarter of the year, Stiefel said the company should be able to bring in “newness” and innovation to excite customers again.


Delta Air Lines — The airline reported a more than 36 percent decline in quarterly profit and has forecast its passenger unit revenue — a metric closely watched by Wall Street — to increase 1 percent to 3 percent in the second quarter of 2017.


Mylan — Shares of the drugmaker began falling Tuesday afternoon following the release of a letter to the firm from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which raised concerns about quality controls at one of Mylan’s manufacturing plants in India. The FDA stated in its letter several violations at the plant in question included a failure to “thoroughly investigate” unexplained discrepancies in drug batches, along with “missing, deleted, and lost data.”


Wal-Mart StoresNews surfaced Tuesday that the big-box retailer is eliminating hundreds of jobs in its latest attempt to cut costs, as it invests in online and competes with e-commerce giant Amazon. A spokesman confirmed to CNBC that the layoffs will span the company’s international, technology and Sam’s Club divisions.


Pepsi — The beverage and snacks company was upgraded to positive from neutral at Susquehanna on Wednesday, with the firm citing the fact that Pepsi shares are trading at a discount. Further, the analyst said Pepsi could be involved in more M&A deals in 2017, such as something with U.S. food and beverage conglomerate Kraft Heinz.


Rent-A-Center — Shares of the rent-to-own business surged earlier in the week after Rent-A-Center announced a new strategic plan, which excited investors. Stifel issued an updated note to clients on Wednesday, writing: “Rent-A-Center is clearly in a fight to retain control of the company … There is no doubt that Rent-A-Center has been poorly managed in recent years.” The firm maintains a hold rating on Rent-A-Center stock.




Early movers: UAL, WFM, LULU, MYL, WMT, PEP & more

Classified

 
//1b3f701f762c5777fab5995115fd53dae71219d6c602550dcc/